Freeman Hunt

Photography and commentary from a libertarian and former atheist.

Friday, June 30, 2006

Intelligence and Vision

From Asa Hutchinson:

“Whether it’s a local factory, a family-owned restaurant or farm, a new shop downtown, or any other small enterprise, state government should help these business grow and create jobs, not get in their way,” Hutchinson said. “Unfortunately, government is too often getting in the way – whether by passing more taxes and regulations or making it easier to seize the property of business owners.”...

“The latest threat to small businesses is the trend around the country of local governments seizing smaller, more vulnerable business properties and handing them over to larger developers,” Hutchinson said. “My opponent, Attorney General Mike Beebe, issued an opinion saying we don’t need to worry about property rights abuse in Arkansas and that we don’t need stronger property rights. I disagree – strongly. This doesn’t just go against our core values -- it stifles our economy, because it places small business owners at risk. We need to be a friend, not an enemy, to entrepreneurs and small business owners in Arkansas, and assure them that we will protect their rights.”

Hutchinson also pointed to Arkansas’s high level of taxation, one of the highest in the nation, as another example of how small businesses are facing undue burdens, and how this makes Arkansas less competitive with surrounding states.

“The high cost of high taxes is one thing standing in the way of an unprecedented era of growth and better jobs in Arkansas,” Hutchinson said. “My opponent has voted for virtually every tax hike that has come down the pike during his 20 years in the Senate, which is one reason why Arkansas has one of the least friendly business climates in the country. My administration will tackle this problem directly.”
In a state dogged by high taxes, buddy-buddy politics, and government interference, this is a very welcome and different sort of talk. I can't wait to vote for him in the fall.

Happy 205th!

Andy is celebrating Frederic Bastiat's birthday over at Club for Growth.

"Truth, Justice, and All That Stuff."

Not so inspiring talk from Superman:

Michael Dougherty and Dan Harris sought to downplay Superman's long-standing patriot act. With one brief line uttered by actor Frank Langella, the caped superhero's mission transformed from "truth, justice and the American way" to "truth, justice and all that stuff."
That makes me want to skip the movie.

Friday Unintentional Humor

Something to make you laugh out loud.

Wednesday, June 28, 2006

Good, Because the Answer Is Nothing

Conversation with a doctor I went to see yesterday because of a sore throat.

Doctor: "What have you taken to treat this?"
FH: "Nothing. I didn't know what was allowed [during pregnancy]."
Doctor: "Good, because the answer is 'nothing.' Nothing is preferable to anything."
At least it was a straight and simple answer.

Starting A Slow Schism

An apt title for this TIME article about the current situation in the Anglican Communion.

McCain the Weathervane

John McCain contributes a guest post at Porkbusters (via Glenn):

So why has my party, the party of small government, lately adopted the practices of our opponents who believe the bigger the government the better? I'm afraid it's because at times we value our incumbency more than our principles.
No kidding. And this coming from one of the chief architects of Campaign Finance Reform AKA The Incumbency Protection Act.

I am not a McCain fan, however, at least if McCain is getting behind efforts like Porkbusters, you can guess that there is a shift in momentum going on somewhere in Congress. Maybe one can even hope for some media attention on the issue.

Tuesday, June 27, 2006

The 26th Carnival of Homeschooling...

...is up.

UPDATE: I've corrected my error. This is the 26th Carnival of Homeschooling, not the 25th.

Monday, June 26, 2006

Springdale Shouldn't Pay for Ballpark

There is a special election on July 11th in Springdale, Arkansas. Voters will decide whether or not to extend a one percent sales tax for three years in order to build a new stadium.

Our sales tax rate is over nine percent. That's totally absurd in a town where people also pay property tax and state income tax. So how do our city bureaucrats justify keeping our taxes so high?

They tell us all the things one would expect: the city will get more taxes, the stadium will create jobs, people will like going to the stadium, etc.

But how is that any different from any other business?

This isn't exactly an area that's hurting for capital. There is incredible wealth in our area. If this ballpark is such a fantastic business venture, why aren't the businessmen who stand to profit from the stadium, for example the men who own the land all around the proposed site, raising the capital to finance it?

Wal-Mart doesn't ask us to build their stores. Tyson doesn't ask us to build their plants. J.B. Hunt doesn't ask us to build their trucks. Why should we build a ballpark for Gary George?

This proposal is a loser. I'll be voting NO on July 11th.

Incoherent

You are not forgotten. I am so exhausted that I cannot produce a coherent thought, and I'd like to keep the blog coherent. I assume that this exhausted incoherence is another temporary side effect of pregnancy and will abate soon.

Falling asleep at my desk...

Friday, June 23, 2006

Demagoguery on the Voting Rights Act

Here's what's going on with the Voting Rights Act:

WASHINGTON -- House Republican leaders postponed a vote Wednesday on renewing the 1965 Voting Rights Act after some Republican lawmakers said it unfairly singles out seven Southern states, Alaska and Arizona for federal oversight. ...

It was unclear whether the legislation would come up this year. The temporary provisions don't expire until 2007, but leaders of both parties had hoped to pass the act and use it to further their prospects in the fall's midterm elections.

The statement said the GOP leaders are committed to renewing the law "as soon as possible." ...

The shift came after a private House GOP caucus meeting Wednesday in which several Republicans also balked at extending provisions in the law that require ballots to be printed in more than one language in neighborhoods where there are large numbers of immigrants, said several participants. ...

Several Republicans, led by Westmoreland, had worked to allow an amendment that would ease a requirement that nine states win permission from the Justice Department or a federal judge to change their voting rules.

The amendment's backers say the requirement unfairly singles out and holds accountable nine states that practiced racist voting policies decades ago, based on 1964 voter turnout data: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, Texas and Virginia.
Okay, so everyone wants to pass the Act, it isn't close to expiring, and some legislators are concerned about bilingual ballots and old elements of the law that require certain states to get federal permission to change their voting rules. That's reasonable. People want to update the Act and pass it.

But get ready for the demagoguery. Eugene Robinson's got it covered:

Wednesday we had one of those rare high-definition moments, when the House Republican caucus defied its leaders and refused to back renewal of the Voting Rights Act.

That tells you about all you need to know, doesn't it?
Well, no. It doesn't at all. It doesn't tell you why.

In what was described as a contentious caucus meeting, Southern Republicans complained that their states were being singled out by the act, which was originally intended to do away with the poll taxes, literacy tests and other measures that were used to deprive black voters of their rights during the Jim Crow era. Having grown up in South Carolina during the "last throes" (to quote Dick Cheney in another context) of racial segregation, I can testify that the states in question went far out of their way to earn the enhanced scrutiny the Voting Rights Act forces them to endure.
True, but no one is proposing that those states shouldn't have been singled out decades ago. Why should issues of 40 years ago be held in perpetuity? Shouldn't the states under scrutiny be updated regularly to ensure that the right states are being scrutinized?

Most members of Congress agree, and there probably would have been no problem if other members of the caucus hadn't raised a separate issue: the act's requirement that bilingual ballots be made available in localities where significant numbers of voters speak a language other than English.

Hmmm. Let me take a wild guess: Any chance the issue might be voters who speak, say, Spanish? Any chance this is just a warm-up for the rabid demagoguery we're going to hear from Republicans on the immigration issue this fall?
Isn't this a legitimate concern considering how easy Democrats would like to make it for people to commit voter fraud? (Here I refer especially to their opposition to voter ID.) Shouldn't we be concerned with non-citizens voting? And even that aside, bilingual ballots add another layer of concern: accuracy of translation.

No, no, no, it's just that Republicans are a bunch of racist hate-mongers who hate blacks and Latinos. The current administration is the most diverse in history just to trick people. Sure, it's the Democrats who have the former KKK senator, but he's all reformed now aside from the occasional slip of the n-word, so it doesn't matter. And yes, it's the Democrats who like to say that minorities are unable to obtain identification, but that's not racist because Democrats just want to help people. And yes, it's the Democrats who strive for class warfare and racial division, but that's just to work to a good end.

This whole Voting Rights Act thing couldn't possibly be about updating a law that is several decades old. . .

Passing on the 24 Addiction

Just back from showing the first disc of the first season to the uninitiated. Already they're jonesing for more.

Thursday, June 22, 2006

ECUSA Women's Ministries

Pro-choice marching.

Beijing Circles:

CIRCLE GUIDELINES

• Create your circle.
• Consider it sacred space.
• One person speaks at a time.
• Speak and listen from the heart.
• Encourage and welcome diverse points of view.
• Listen with discernment rather than judgment.
• Share leadership and resources.
• Decide together how decisions will be made.
• Work toward consensus when possible.
• Offer experience instead of advice.
• When in doubt or need, pause and silently ask for guidance.
• Decide together what is to be held in confidence.
• Speak from your own experience and beliefs rather than speaking for others.
• Open and close the circle by hearing each voice.
A Women's Creed.

I could go on and on. You can look for yourself here. These are ministries? Hilarious.

I have to admit that I'm generally not interested in the "women's ministries" of any church. It seems like they're always centered on talking about what it's like to be a woman (lame), making some sort of craft or food (requires skills and interests I don't have), event-planning (pure torture), or just plain gossip (boring). I know that many women love this stuff, and my parenthetical opinions are just the opinions of one person, but it does make me wonder:

Why do women need different ministries than men?

Note: I'm not referring to priesthood; that's another issue. I'm writing about lay ministry here.

Blanket Gun Bans: "...[T]hey are unconstitutional on their face."

Good to see an attempt to rein in state bureaucrats who try to set up their own little tin hat dictatorships over our constitutional rights.

“In a post-9/11 world, we must acknowledge that border security does not stop in El Paso or New York City."

Asa Hutchinson lays out specific ways in which state government can combat illegal immigration.

If you are waiting on specifics of any kind from Beebe, it would be a bad idea to hold your breath.

Don't We Have Terminators By Now?

Heh.

What Are You Reading This Summer?

I'm loaded down with baby books since I'm at the beginning of my first pregnancy, but you can find some excellent recommendations of the non-baby variety over at National Review.

Unwanted Phone Calls

I know that a couple people from the Arkansas Democrat Gazette read this blog. Could one of you please talk to your subscription sales department?

Ignoring my dozens of polite requests to "please take me off your list" and calling me everyday (sometimes twice a day) on my cell phone does not make me want to take the paper. It ensures that I associate your paper with bad manners and inconvenience.

"We would prefer to consider them future human beings, but now, science, not religion, is telling us they are already male or female."

Father Jonathan comments on the implications of IVF sex selection.

500 WMD Found in Iraq So Far

Next time someone tries to tell you that there were no WMD in Iraq, point him to this link:

The weapons are thought to be manufactured before 1991 so they would not be proof of an ongoing WMD program in the 1990s. But they do show that Saddam Hussein was lying when he said all weapons had been destroyed, and it shows that years of on-again, off-again weapons inspections did not uncover these munitions.

Wednesday, June 21, 2006

How Did Your Congressman Vote on the Flake Amendments to Curb Pork?

Andy Roth has a list of the excellent 39 House members who voted YES on all five.

I notice that no one from Arkansas is on that list. That's a shame.

Tuesday, June 20, 2006

The 25th Carnival of Homeschooling...

... is up.

And our Internet at work just kicked back into service. The Internet and phones served by our provider had been out all day because someone from another company accidentally cut one of their major fiber optic pipelines. Nice to be reconnected to the world!

Monday, June 19, 2006

"Clarity has been given."

So says Alvin Kimel about the fate of the Episcopal Church. Al left the Episcopal Church about three years ago after being a parish priest for 25 years. After much discussion and struggle over whether to join the Orthodox Church or the Catholic Church, he became a Catholic. His words are well worth reading.

I left the Episcopal church a little over a year ago and am considering converting to Catholicism myself.

Hey Kids, I Didn't Think We Were Getting Enough Time Together, So I Killed Your Baby Brother

This is the strangest editorial I've read in a long time. It begins thus:

The conservative politics of the Bush administration forced me to have an abortion I didn't want. Well, not literally, but let me explain.
Oh, please do...

My husband and I both work, and like many couples, we're starved for time together. One Thursday evening this past March, we managed to snag some rare couple time and, in a sudden rush of passion, I failed to insert my diaphragm.
Hey, wait a minute. . . I thought that this was going to be the Bush administration's fault. . .

I called my ob/gyn to get a prescription for Plan B, the emergency contraceptive pill that can prevent a pregnancy -- but only if taken within 72 hours of intercourse...

The receptionist, however, informed me that my doctor did not prescribe Plan B. No reason given. Neither did my internist. The midwifery practice I had used could prescribe it, but not over the phone, and there were no more open appointments for the day. The weekend -- and the end of the 72-hour window -- was approaching.

But I needed to meet my kids' school bus and, as I was pretty much out of options -- short of soliciting random Virginia doctors out of the phone book -- I figured I'd take my chances and hope for the best.
You call three people, and you're "out of options?" Sure. Don't overtax yourself, lady. Good point about the phone book--having to use that would have been such an annoyance. Of course, you wouldn't have had to use the phone book at all if you'd just put in your diaphram, but this is liberal-I-have-no-responsibility-for-myself world, so no need to go there.

Weeks later, the two drugstore pregnancy tests I took told a different story. Positive. I couldn't believe it.
You couldn't believe it? Really? Weeks earlier you thought it enough of a possibility to half-heartedly look for Plan B.

I'm still in good health, but unlike the last time I was pregnant, nearly a decade ago, I'm now taking three medications. One of them, for high cholesterol, is in the Food and Drug Administration's Pregnancy Category X -- meaning it's a drug you shouldn't take if you're expecting or even planning to get pregnant.
So why didn't you use your birth control?!

I worried because the odds of having a high-risk pregnancy or a baby born with serious health issues rise significantly after age 40.
I'm sure the baby would be comforted to know that you killed it to save it from the "serious health issues" you thought it might possibly have.

My husband and I are involved in all aspects of our children's lives, but even so, we feel we don't get enough time to spend with them as it is.
Can't spend enough time with the kids? Off one of them, and have more time for the others. Problem solved!

Who thinks this way?

When I realized the seriousness of my predicament, I became angry. I knew that Plan B, which could have prevented it, was supposed to have been available over the counter by now. But I also remembered hearing that conservative politics have held up its approval.
It was those insidious conservatives. It wasn't that you didn't use your birth control, barely attempted to get a prescription for Plan B, and are willing to kill your child. Nope, it's all the fault of those who think you should have a prescription for birth control pills.

Meanwhile, I hadn't even been able to get Plan B with a prescription that Friday, because in Virginia, health-care practitioners apparently are allowed to refuse to prescribe any drug that goes against their beliefs.
Actually you could have gotten it with a prescription, but you didn't bother to get the prescription. We'll leave that aside for a moment.

Heaven forbid a man be allowed to do what he thinks is right. He should be forced to do what Dana L, author of this editorial, thinks is right. She shouldn't have to dial the phone again to find a doctor who shares her perspective. People shouldn't be able to make their own choices, they should follow the directives of Dana L.

Moreover, they aren't even required to tell the patient why they won't provide the drug. Nor do they have to provide a list of alternative sources.
Remember that phone book you mentioned earlier? There's your list.

If information on Plan B was hard to come by, and practitioners were evasive on emergency contraception, trying to get information on how to abort a pregnancy in 2006 is an even more Byzantine experience.

On the Internet, most of what I found was political in nature or otherwise unhelpful: pictures of what your baby looks like in the womb from week one, and so on.
So true. When you're looking for information about how to kill someone, it is really unhelpful for people to tell you not to kill someone. It is so unhelpful for them to show the unwitting that their babies are human beings, when you, a witting and fully integrated personality, are well aware that your baby is a human being and are just looking to make it die.

Calling doctors, I felt like a pariah when I asked whether they provided termination services.
There's a reason for that. It's called conscience. It's that thing you're trying to kick back into the cellar by convincing yourself that conservatives made you abort your child.

Finally, I decided to check the Planned Parenthood Web site to see whether its clinics performed abortions.
You had to check the website? I don't believe that any literate adult could be unaware that Planned Parenthood offers abortions. This calls into question the entire letter. Perhaps it is all a poor fiction to try and convince people that conservatives cause abortions. This is all the more likely given that the writer's last name is not signed and her background cannot be checked.

It was a decision I am sorry I had to make. It was awful, painful, sickening. But I feel that this administration gave me practically no choice but to have an unwanted abortion because the way it has politicized religion made it well-nigh impossible for me to get emergency contraception that would have prevented the pregnancy in the first place.
Nevermind that you had regular contraception and didn't use it. Nevermind that you could have gotten the emergency contraception if you'd made any real effort. Nevermind that abortion is not the natural consequence of pregnancy, and no one forced you to take your child's life. It's all Bush's fault.

I have another idea:

Instead of trying desperately to crush your guilt under the heel of self-justification, try simple repentance. I did something wrong, I know it, I am sorry for it. Repentance is much easier than trying to kill off your conscience and your will.

Bad News for Episcopalians

I know many were hopeful that the ECUSA would elect a more conservative presiding bishop to change the course of the church. Unfortunately, that didn't happen:

Katharine Jefferts Schori, 52, bishop of Nevada, was elected from a slate of seven nominees, on the fifth ballot June 18, as the 26th Presiding Bishop. She is the first woman to hold the top post in the church's nearly 400-year history. Her nine-year term officially begins November 1; she will be invested and seated November 4 during a liturgy at Washington National Cathedral. ...

Jefferts Schori said, in a pre-Convention interview, the priorities for the next Presiding Bishop include bridge-building and boundary-crossing as well as "moving our sanctuaries into the streets to encounter and transform the bad news of this world." She added that implementing the United Nation's Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) of embracing and celebrating diversity, eradicating poverty and hunger, and creating an environmentally sustainable world are also priorities.
Elected presiding bishop of a church with 2.4 million people and her priorities are "bridge-building," "boundary-crossing," and implementing goals set by the UN. Isn't this a religious organization? This sounds like bureaucrat politico speak. It also sounds mushy; those aren't very solid goals, just vague platitudes with undefined terms. (e.g. How does one acheive "boundary-crossing" and what, exactly, does that mean?)

I feel bad for my Episcopalian friends. This is the presiding bishop for the next nine years. One can forget about the church taking a turn back to Christianity during that time. For the Episcopal Church leadership, Christianity is now synonymous with leftist politics. Charity at the point of a gun through the power of the state, beneficent central planning, and deference to the anointed (themselves) is their new creed.

The Episcopal Church is well on its way to becoming a Unitarian Universalist church with the word "Christian" papered over it.

Regular Episcopalians are going to have to start taking notice right away, listening closely to what is said in pulpits and paying attention to the goings-on at state and national levels. If they don't stand up and do something about it immediately, the Episcopal church will lose its Christian identity completely. It is already well on its way.

Sunday, June 18, 2006

Happy Father's Day

My Dad when he was around my age:
The amazing thing is that, aside from an update to the hairstyle, he looks exactly the same now as he did then. Happy father's day, Dad!

Government Programs Remain True to Form: Katrina Aid Blown

16% of the debit card cost is fraud:

Though the headline makers were select items purchased with debit cards that FEMA gave out immediately after Katrina struck, the centerpiece of the survey was an estimate that about 16% of the agency's more than $6 billion in overall hurricane relief payments were improper and potentially fraudulent. And that figure is probably on the low side because it only accounts for certain categories of fraud, such as misrepresentation of identity and duplicate payments. ...

The 16% of improper expenditures is indeed high for a federal aid program — food stamps and unemployment insurance, by comparison, had respective rates of 5.9% and 10.1% last fiscal year. But these are established programs, not on-the-fly responses that had to process a sudden rush of 2.6 million claims. Unlike a permanent safety net, disaster relief's top priority is to help as many people as fast as possible, which comes at the price of reduced efficiency.
Ack! 5.9% of food stamp payments and 10.1% of unemployment insurance payments are fraudulent? That's deplorable.

Can you imagine if 10% of a company's payroll was bleeding out to fake employees and duplicate paychecks?

Strangely, the editorial doesn't comment on this and instead constrasts blaming FEMA with blaming the debit card recipients for frivolous expenditures. It ends with this:

[O]bsessing about the spending habits of refugees comes perilously close to blaming the victim.
If you mean blaming bad spenders, who happen to be victims of a hurricane, for bad spending, then yes, I do blame them. If you use your money, however gained, like an idiot, you should blame yourself for your bad choices. So what?

If you mean blaming bad spenders for the fact that the government wastes money, then no, I don't blame them. I blame our officials for spending our money and buying our votes, and I blame us for letting them.

Return

I went to visit my Dad over the weekend for Father's Day. Great trip! I've now returned.

Thursday, June 15, 2006

10,000 Visits

Someone from Malaysia just registered the 10,000th visit to Freeman Hunt.

Readers, you are appreciated! Just letting you know.

A Great Example of Why I Left the Episcopal Church

Via Amy Welborn who has the link to the full story:

Dave Hartline I just spoke with Bishop Chilton and she was pressed for time so I was wondering if you could answer the question the conservative folks are asking. Is the Episcopal Church following Scripture.

Herschel Hartford
You know scripture is more than the meaning of words. It is the meaning of the word. I believe we are following the overall word of God. We are accepting people as God sends them to us. How anyone can say, that they can’t accept a person who has certain feelings contrary to their own, is beyond my understanding. Where in Scripture does it say we should have a blessing of the animals, or boats and houses? We bless all of those things. I am a heterosexual man who is married and has six kids. I don't understand how anyone could be against blessing a consensual relationship.

Dave Hartline The traditional side says 2,000 years of Christian tradition is being altered. How do you respond?

Herschel Hartford
Who are we to tell someone how to live and think?

Dave Hartline
Do you think there is any black and white in the Episcopal Church?

Herschel Hartford
Yes, we are against poverty, racism, sexism and bias against sexual orientation.

Dave Hartline Is abortion black and white

Herschel Hartford No, it is in the eye of the beholder. It is a very complicate issue.
I actually know Herschel Hartford in passing. I was introduced to him while I was the "Minister of Youth Formation," a fancy title for youth minister, at the Episcopal Church where I used to be a member. He's a really nice guy, but he's also wrong. How can he not see how utterly ridiculous his last two answers sound when taken together? Bias against others is black and white while killing others is gray area? Of course one thing he doesn't mention is that they believe government is the solution to all of the world's social ills.

If I recall correctly, he showed his college students What the Bleep Do We Know, a ridiculous New Age cult recruitment film that misrepresents quantum physics and espouses all sorts of metaphysical absurdities.

And why have I even seen that movie? Because an Epsicopal priest recommended it to me as an example of a dialogue between religion and science. Unbelievable. I guess if you use "religion" interchangeably with "New Age mysticism" and "science" interchangeably with "pseudo-science", he wouldn't have been far off.

I left the Episcopal Church shortly after I took the youth group to a state Epsicopal youth weekend retreat. When we arrived, we found out that the theme for the retreat was dream interpretation based on Jungian psychology. The kids had to sit through hours of talks about their inner "selves," including the "inner child," and detailing the Byzantine network of supposed symbols in their dreams. Since this is a blog for adults, I'll go ahead and put it bluntly: It was the most inane bullshit I've ever witnessed, and that's saying quite a lot.

Most regular Episcopalians would balk if they had any idea how fast and loose their leaders play with Christianity.

Wednesday, June 14, 2006

Small Talk

Explored on Althouse.

Big News

Big news at our house. I'll post about it later tonight.

UPDATE 5:54PM: I took a test yesterday. Here's the news:
We are very excited!

But worry not. This blog will not turn into a pregnancy diary. Posting just might not be up to normal levels for a little while because people are calling every ten minutes, and I feel like sleeping twelve hours a day.

Tuesday, June 13, 2006

The 24th Carnival of Homeschooling...

... is up.

Monday, June 12, 2006

Saddam Dossier

New feature on FoxNews.com:

Was Saddam Hussein a security threat to the United States? Did the Iraqi dictator have connections to Al Qaeda or other terrorist ties? What happened to the weapons of mass destruction everyone believed were in his possession? Did Saddam move them? Did they ever exist?

All of those questions have been dogging President George W. Bush and his administration since the start of the Iraq war. Politicians and respected U.S. military and intelligence officials have weighed in publicly on both sides of the debate, but until recently the general public has had little of the information necessary to make a fully informed decision on its own.

But that is changing.

The U.S. government seized thousands of classified Iraqi government papers when Saddam's regime was toppled, and Washington recently released a trove of these documents on the Pentagon's Foreign Military Studies Office Web site.


The documents, many in Arabic and with no accompanying translation, provide multiple insights into events inside pre-war Iraq. The dossier, however, is huge and disorganized. Digging out its secrets is a laborious task — one that the U.S. government decided to leave to others. ...

With a small cadre of independent translators to support his efforts, Robison will now translate and analyze scores of the unexplored trove of documents from Saddam's regime in a FOXNews.com exclusive series: The Saddam Dossier.
Definitely something to watch. Read the rest of it to find out more about Robinson and to read the first installment.

52 Minutes for Turning

Abu Musab al-Zarqawi lived for 52 minutes after a U.S. warplane bombed his hideout northeast of Baghdad
That he had 52 minutes gives me greater hope. I hope that as he stared his mortality in the face, some part of him understood the evil he'd wrought. I hope that he repented of it.

Huckabee, Please Be Quiet

This is just embarassing.

If you can't understand free markets, if you can't understand why the price of oil is up, if you support a minimum wage increase, and if you back a smoking ban that doesn't allow people to set their own smoking rules on their own private property, you should consider switching over to the Democratic party. You seem to have forgotten what a Republican is supposed to be.

Sunday, June 11, 2006

Packing for the Move

I have been hacking away at the keyboard to get ready for the move to freemanhunt.com. As I am new to CSS, this is taking up most of my time.

Feel free to stop by what will be the new site to observe the changes as I make them or to leave comments in the test posts about what you love or hate thus far. (Note: That doesn't mean that I'll necessarily change anything based on the comments received, but reading your comments would offer a nice break here and there.)

See you soon at my new online home.

UPDATE: No, that doesn't mean that I've stopped posting here. I won't be posting at the new site until it's ready to go. New posts will still show up here until otherwise announced.

Saturday, June 10, 2006

Illegal Immigrant with Outstanding Deportation Order Involved in Northwest Arkansas Drive By Shooting

Very bad:

[Daniel Ray] Francis, 32, was shot in the back of the head just before 4 p.m. Saturday near U.S. Highway 71 Business and Pleasant Grove Road in Lowell. Francis was a passenger in an Acura driven by co-worker Tracy R. Stith.
Note that this took place in the middle of the day. Serafin Sandoval Vega pulled the trigger:

Green urged the judge not to set bond for Vega, who she said confessed to "pulling the trigger" and has no ties to the community. Vega also has an arrest warrant in connection with 13 misdemeanor charges from Rogers District Court, according to Green.

Public Defender Jay Saxton, who was appointed to represent Vega, asked the judge to set a reasonable bond for Vega, who his attorney said is a resident alien and has lived in the area for four to 4 1/2 years. ...

Clinger ordered that Vega be held without bond.
It is unclear what definition the newspaper is using for "resident alien," and thus difficult to determine his legal or illegal status.

The driver, however, was an illegal immigrant involved in gang activity who was supposed to have been deported:

The prosecutor claims Ambriz drove up next to Stith’s vehicle, then drove evasively following the shooting. Ambriz also gave three different names to authorities. "The manner he drove facilitated the shooting," Green said. "He drove up. It was a coordinated plan, and he began driving evasively after the shooting." ...

According to court documents, Ambriz is an illegal alien with an outstanding order of removal from the United States. Court documents claim Ambriz is active in the Sureno 13 gang from southern California.
He comes from quite a family:

Federal authorities also revealed that Ambriz’s younger brother was murdered in a drive-by shooting in California, and in retaliation, their father, who is serving four life sentences in a California prison, killed the person who murdered his son and all of the shooter’s family members, according to court documents.
So did these men feel terrible about the murder that they had just committed? Did they hide out in fear of being caught? No. They went straight to Wal-Mart to replenish their ammunition:

Vega told police the trio went to Wal-Mart and purchased more ammunition after the shooting because they were out of bullets, according to court documents.
Read the rest of it for details of the incident.

This is what happens when immigration laws are not enforced and the border is not secured. Why would a gang member subject to deportation not be deported immediately? Securing the border and processing all crossers is vital. We can't track people we haven't even identified.

Lowell is not an area where crime is common. There was not a single murder in Lowell in 2004, the most recent year for which statistics are available. In fact, in the entire county of 173,701, which includes three towns much larger than Lowell, there were only five murders in 2004.

And what does the paper conclude from this story? That cars and guns don't mix. Do the editors at the ADG actually believe that men who commit murder in broad daylight and then head out to reload are just regular people caught up in road rage? Unbelievable.

Friday, June 09, 2006

Windsurfing Across Oceans

Very impressive:

SAINT-DENIS-DE-LA-REUNION, Reunion (Reuters) - Frenchwoman Raphaela le Gouvello became the first person to windsurf across the Indian Ocean on Thursday after spending 60 days at sea on a specially designed 7-metre (23-foot) board.

Le Gouvello, 46, set out from Exmouth in northwestern Australia on April 9 and windsurfed some 6,500 km to get to the French island of La Reunion.
Raphaela's site about the Indian Ocean crossing is here. But this isn't the first ocean she's crossed on a windsurf. She's also c